Estados Unidos ya está viviendo las campañas para las elecciones presidenciales de fin de año, que tendrán un impacto en todo el mundo. Entre el furor que despertaron los discursos de Obama, los gratos recuerdos de Clinton y la pésima imagen que tiene el partido Republicano en la región, los medios argentinos parecen olvidarse de McCain. Sin embargo, el ex héroe de guerra sigue subiendo en las encuestas y puede ganar en noviembre ¿Sería esto bueno o malo para la región?
Por lo pronto, hay varios puntos en su favor: 1) McCain no es lo mismo que Bush. En el partido Republicano lo consideran un RINO (Republican in name only), un republicano solo en nombre. Es decir que no es un Neo-con o un ultra conservador. Esto le da mayor apoyo entre los votantes independientes. Lo demostró en el 2005 cuando presentó una enmienda en la cual prohibía la tortura de prisioneros de guerra, yendo en contra de su propio partido para defender los derechos individuales. Él mismo fue prisionero de guerra durante cinco años (rechazó ser liberado por ser hijo de un General, y se quedó hasta que soltaron a sus compañeros). Ganó raudamente las primarias, consiguió el apoyó de Bush y del partido, a pesar de ciertos conservadores que lo miran con resquemor.
2) McCain nació en Panamá y es el candidato que mejor conoce la región, ya que la ha visitado decenas de veces, mucho más que los pre-candidatos demócratas.
3) McCain está a favor de la apertura económica. En un momento de probable recesión económica, donde los demócratas están bregando por mayor proteccionismo, el candidato republicano defiende el libre comercio. Este es un factor fundamental, ya que afecta toda la región, defendiendo los tratados existentes y proponiendo nuevos tratados (por ejemplo con Colombia).
4) En este sentido, está a favor de eliminar los subsidios agrícolas, lo cual también sería muy beneficioso para la región. En varias ocasiones le entregaron el premio por ser el defensor del dinero de los contribuyentes en el Senado, que es consecuente con bajar los subsidios al agro. Estas medidas beneficiarían a los países que exportan productos agrícolas, especialmente si logra poner presión para que Europa haga lo mismo.
En cuanto al tema inmigratorio, McCain propone asegurar las fronteras para frenar la entrada de inmigrantes ilegales y al mismo tiempo dar soluciones a los 12 millones de inmigrantes ilegales que hoy residen en EE.UU.; a la vez mejorar las opciones para inmigrantes legales, por ejemplo con visas temporarias de trabajo. En general el voto Latino (excepto el Cubano y tal vez el Venezolano) en EE.UU. va para los demócratas, pero esto tiene que ver más con las políticas internas, ya que a los Latinos que no viven en EE.UU. les es más importante los tratados comerciales.
Aunque no afecte directamente, muchos latinoamericanos critican la guerra en Irak. McCain apoyó la guerra (Hillary también, aunque ahora dice que fue un error) en el 2004, aunque fue crítico de la estrategia. No obstante, lo que se debate ahora es como salir de ahí. Los candidatos demócratas proponen salir de inmediato, dejando que los Iraquíes se las arreglen solos. En su campaña prometen cosas que suenan bien pero son difíciles de cumplir y podrían tener efectos nefastos para los propios iraquíes. McCain propone quedarse el tiempo que sea necesario, lo cual tampoco es una garantía. En un momento donde la economía esta bajo estrés los norteamericanos están pidiendo que los millones de dólares que se gastan en Irak se vuelquen a la sociedad y ese es el tema que pesa en la campaña (no tanto qué es lo mejor para el pueblo Iraquí). De modo que ninguna de las estrategias mencionadas parece garantizar una mejora del conflicto.
A pesar de esto, el principal argumento de que McCain no sería la mejor opción para Latino América es casi por una cuestión de imagen. Un presidente republicano de 71 años de edad, después de 8 años de Bush en el poder, que deja una pésima imagen internacional por las guerras, la decadencia de las libertades individuales en EE.UU. con el Acta Patriótica, la prisión de Guantánamo, las torturas y finalmente con complicaciones económicas. Existe un clamor por la alternancia en el poder.
A la vez, Obama un carismático joven negro, con un mensaje de cambio y esperanza, no sólo mejoraría la imagen de EE.UU. en todo el mundo. Es un líder que provoca furor entre la gente joven y los desconfiados en los sistemas políticos y tal vez sería capaz de contagiar al resto del continente, acercando el calor popular hacia EE.UU..
Todavía queda mucho tiempo para seguir evaluando las propuestas de los candidatos antes de las elecciones de noviembre. Pero, más allá del poder de la imagen, lo cierto es que no debemos descartar a McCain antes de tiempo, porque es él quien ha presentado las mejores propuestas para la economía de nuestra región.
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta elecciones USA. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta elecciones USA. Mostrar todas las entradas
viernes, 4 de abril de 2008
miércoles, 27 de febrero de 2008
Primary Elections in USA
I have the privilage to be in USA, following one of the most exiting primary elections in the last years. It is amazing to see how people participate in the election of their next presidential candidate.
In Austin, I was outside (imposible to get in) one of the debates between Senator Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton. It felt like a triumph of democracy. Thousand of people went out to the street to chear for their favorite candidate. Mainly students and afroamericans cheering for Obama, who moves crowds like a rockstar. Mainly women supporting Hillary, who were less, but more organizaed and noisy. Each supporters on different sides on the streat, with there banners, there drums and there hopes.
Obama people chanting "yes we can", Hillary people answering "Not a plan". Both pationate, but peaceful. Both convinced that there candidate was the best, but respecting that others had a different point of view. Both they had in common that they went there freely, no one went for money, for a job, but because they had a conviction. The same conviction that takes many people to volunteer to work in the campaign, to donate there money (Obama has raised $ 75 million with donations of less then $ 100)and to support there leader. They have heard their candidates debate 20 times (yes 20!), so they know how they acted in the past, there values, their stength and weakneses and which there policy will be.
And this is the primary election, once this is over they will unite to join forces to try and have a Democrat as President. They will face a Republican and all its support. The issues will be different and maybe more agresive, but it will be a new feast of democracy regards of who wins. What a great privilage to be able to choose who will be the next presidential candidate in a democratic way.
In Austin, I was outside (imposible to get in) one of the debates between Senator Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton. It felt like a triumph of democracy. Thousand of people went out to the street to chear for their favorite candidate. Mainly students and afroamericans cheering for Obama, who moves crowds like a rockstar. Mainly women supporting Hillary, who were less, but more organizaed and noisy. Each supporters on different sides on the streat, with there banners, there drums and there hopes.
Obama people chanting "yes we can", Hillary people answering "Not a plan". Both pationate, but peaceful. Both convinced that there candidate was the best, but respecting that others had a different point of view. Both they had in common that they went there freely, no one went for money, for a job, but because they had a conviction. The same conviction that takes many people to volunteer to work in the campaign, to donate there money (Obama has raised $ 75 million with donations of less then $ 100)and to support there leader. They have heard their candidates debate 20 times (yes 20!), so they know how they acted in the past, there values, their stength and weakneses and which there policy will be.
And this is the primary election, once this is over they will unite to join forces to try and have a Democrat as President. They will face a Republican and all its support. The issues will be different and maybe more agresive, but it will be a new feast of democracy regards of who wins. What a great privilage to be able to choose who will be the next presidential candidate in a democratic way.
martes, 12 de febrero de 2008
First Impresion of USA!
I arrived on Sunday at Austin, after loosing my flight in Washinton DC, and passing by Chicago (wonderfull view of the city covered in Snow!). I must admit that before coming here I already had some admiration for this country (I don't like war, nor Mac Donalds, nor buying things I do not need and am not a fan of their TV nor music) but I do admire the countries diversity, the freedom, rule of law, and the ideas of their funding fathers. I think it is a mixture of cultures, where inpite of its defects, there is freedom, excelent educations and a great respect for others.
Taking this into account, I am suprized by Austin: the size of the cars (everything seems huge), the University (it is a city in itself) and the order in the city. People seem very friendly and warm. It is also interesting to observe the primary elections campaign (we might be able to see a Hillary vs Obama debate!). Have heard two specialy interesting lectures, one on the role of mass media, war and sensorship (very critical to the USA, and with a left wing (moraly liberal) bias), but with really interesting facts, that were mind blowing and showed another view of the conection between war, economy and power.
The second lecture was on the relationship of religion and politics, analyzing the life of Abrham Lincon. The professor showed the importance of personal faith in a man who fought against slavery and mentioned one of my heros (Wiliam Willberforce), it was really helpfull to learn how faith plays such a central role in politics in this country. This is specialy usefull to me, cause the desire of my heart is to serve the Lord with my life, in politics.
So as you can imagine my first impresion of USA is totaly favorable, with its diversity, different opinions, freedom and respect.
Taking this into account, I am suprized by Austin: the size of the cars (everything seems huge), the University (it is a city in itself) and the order in the city. People seem very friendly and warm. It is also interesting to observe the primary elections campaign (we might be able to see a Hillary vs Obama debate!). Have heard two specialy interesting lectures, one on the role of mass media, war and sensorship (very critical to the USA, and with a left wing (moraly liberal) bias), but with really interesting facts, that were mind blowing and showed another view of the conection between war, economy and power.
The second lecture was on the relationship of religion and politics, analyzing the life of Abrham Lincon. The professor showed the importance of personal faith in a man who fought against slavery and mentioned one of my heros (Wiliam Willberforce), it was really helpfull to learn how faith plays such a central role in politics in this country. This is specialy usefull to me, cause the desire of my heart is to serve the Lord with my life, in politics.
So as you can imagine my first impresion of USA is totaly favorable, with its diversity, different opinions, freedom and respect.
viernes, 25 de enero de 2008
USA´s Elections
Who shall be the next President of the most powerful country? Even though many of us are not residents of USA and can not vote, we will be affected by this year’s election.
In the Primary elections there are a wide range of candidates which try to catch voter’s attention, putting emphasis on different issues which cause tension. The struggle between security and privacy-freedom, ecology and industrial growth, between peace and security. Immigrants and minorities. How to deal with Iraq and terrorism, how to deal with the probable economic recession. More or less Government intervention? Should the private life of the candidates mater? Their faith and religious views?
I am interested to find out who you would vote for and why. You can answer the pole and leave your comment.
In the Primary elections there are a wide range of candidates which try to catch voter’s attention, putting emphasis on different issues which cause tension. The struggle between security and privacy-freedom, ecology and industrial growth, between peace and security. Immigrants and minorities. How to deal with Iraq and terrorism, how to deal with the probable economic recession. More or less Government intervention? Should the private life of the candidates mater? Their faith and religious views?
I am interested to find out who you would vote for and why. You can answer the pole and leave your comment.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)